I ran pretty hot playing 60s the last couple times I played. Even though I had an extremely small sample size at both $30s and $60s, I felt that I was competent enough to move up to $100s since I have the bankroll to do so.
I played my first session with $100s today. There were fewer people playing $100s, and there were more regs. This meant it was MUCH harder to open sit lobbies than at $60s. I ended playing 49 $100s and losing ~8 buy-ins. I ran around 3 buy-ins below EV. I also played 28 $60s and won a buy-in.
I felt like I was running bad, losing a lot of flips, and always running into the nuts, but I’m sure I could have avoided plenty of my losses. It was definitely frustrating because I felt like I was losing over and over again. I’m not sure if the frustration was amplified because I knew I was losing more $100s than $60s.
Another problem I likely had was that since $100s were so slow to register, I was frequently in two lobbies and having to 2-table. I had previously only 1-tabled, so I’m sure this didn’t really help my cause.
Will review tomorrow and hopefully plug some leaks that undoubtedly came to be during my foray into $100s.
No Comments